November
19, 2001
By whatistoknow
"Our small group
was talking about how salvation belongs
to the Lord, and to Him alone, dependent on His mercy
and grace. We
discussed how the Lord shows mercy to certain people
according to
His own good will and pleasure. Then one person asked
why the Lord
chose not to save the whole world, because He, being the
sovereign
God who can do ALL things, could have done that if He
chose to do
so. I know that the more important question is to ask,
'Why did he
choose me?' instead of 'How come he doesn't save them?'
However,
this question is coming from someone whose family
members are not
saved. We have two in our group in that situation. I
used to be
content with that ask-the-right-question explanation,
but i feel
that this is not helpful for her. And it seems to me now
that such
an explanation is only evading the question
asked."
First it
must be stated that God's basis for choosing is
completely different
from humanity's way. For example, the Bible says that
God chooses
the poor and unwanted and weak in the world. (1 Corinthians 1:26-
31). This is proven by history where Christianity has most
thrived in
impoverished countries (see e.g., article on the Veritas
site,
"Christianity is no longer a Western
religion"). This is
in great contrast to human beings who choose the rich
and popular
and handsome. One good example of this contrast is in
the area of
adoptions where it is the Christians (following the
example of their
Lord) who adopt the crippled, blind, and mentally
handicapped
children, whereas most others choose to adopt healthy,
cute, normal
kids. Though the answer to this question is ultimately a
mystery,
from what we do know, God's basis for choosing is less
selfish and
superficial and indeed morally superior to ours. We must
be mindful
of this when we criticize the results of God's choosing
based upon
our own biases.
To address the question
more specifically, this analogy by R.C.
Sproul may prove helpful. Dr. Sproul once taught a class
where he
said from day one, "There will be three papers, if
you are late
turning them in, you get an automatic F." When the
due date for
the first paper came around, three people came into
class trembling
and begging Dr. Sproul for an extension. They said that
they were so
busy that they couldn't get it done. Dr. Sproul replied,
"You
know what I had said from day one about the automatic F,
but I will
give you a one week extension." The three students
thanked him
profusely. When the second paper deadline came, about
ten students
came into class shaking in fear and asking Dr. Sproul
for an
extension, giving various excuses. Dr. Sproul looked
stern and
reminded them about his automatic F policy, that they
all had fair
notice, but in the end, Dr. Sproul gave them all a one
week
extension. When the third and final paper deadline came,
half the
class did not finish their papers in time. They were not
afraid
because they all expected Dr. Sproul to give them
extensions. When
Dr. Sproul saw this, he took his grade book out and
began calling
out the class' names: "Anderson, where's your
paper?"
Anderson replied, "I don't have it." Dr.
Sproul yelled out
and marked, "F!" Dr. Sproul then asked,
"Baker,
where's your paper?" Baker replied, "I don't
have
it." Dr. Sproul yelled out and marked,
"F!" . . . and
down the list Dr. Sproul went, marking students' grades
with F's.
About half way through the list, a student cried out,
"But
that's not fair!" When Dr. Sproul heard this, he
said,
"Johnson, was that you?" Johnson replied,
"Yes."
Dr. Sproul then said, "You want fair? I noticed
that you were
late on your first two papers and I gave you extensions
on both of
them. Since you want fair, I will give you F's for both
papers."
Sproul's point was that
those who complain when God chooses to
act justly toward some rather than to act graciously
toward all has
not realized that God is only obligated to act justly
toward all
rather than to act graciously to even one.
Dr. Sproul didn't HAVE to
give extensions to the late students.
In fact we must question whether Dr. Sproul was being
unfair to the
other students who had submitted their papers on time.
Similarly, it
seems very unfair to me that all the people in hell are
justly
paying for their crimes while believers get away with
their sins and
get "extensions" on their lives.
To elaborate, let's suppose
a governor pardons a serial murderer
on death row. Would you then protest, "Governor,
why don't you
pardon all of the serial murderers on death row? You
pardoned one,
so why don't you pardon all?" More likely, you
would protest,
"Governor, how could you pardon even one
murderer?"
Likewise, it makes no sense to wonder why God does not act
graciously toward more sinners. The wonder is in the
wrong place.
Do you remember the OJ
Simpson trial? I am still disgusted by the
jury that freed that double murderer. In a way, my
struggle has been
how not to be disgusted with God for pardoning even
Christians. The
true objection for me is not why God is not gracious
toward all, but
how God can be gracious toward even one and yet still be
just
Himself. That is the underlying problem that Romans
3:25-26 wrestles with. Another good passage to study
is Matthew
20:1-16.